Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: S.Rep No. 417. supra, at 27 n.108. The house report, also citing Arlington Heights, provides that plaintiffs would not be parrnhar to prove that discriminatory purpose the sole dominant. or even the primary purpose for the challenged practice or procedure but only that it has been motivating factor the challenged decision H.R Rep NO 227. 97th Cong, 1st Sess. 30 n.101 (1981). According to Arlington Heighis, determining whether racial purpose 'motivating factor reguires nsi tive inquiry into such direct and circumstantial evidence of intent as may be available Aside from specific smok- ing gun, evidence Ariington Heights identifies various factors that are probative of racial intent: whether the impact of the official action bears more heavily on auo race than the other the historical back < ...
(.png)
